Intellectual Property Dispute in Tech Startups

TTFTC promotes fair competition, equal business opportunities, and transparent practices in Trinidad and Tobago.

Two tech startups, InnovateTech and CodeGenius, are entangled in a complex legal battle over allegations of intellectual property theft. This case highlights the critical issue of protecting intellectual assets and the potential consequences when disputes arise.

The Parties:

  • InnovateTech: A startup known for developing innovative software solutions for the healthcare industry. They claim to have created a groundbreaking software platform that streamlines patient data management.
  • CodeGenius: Another tech startup specializing in software development. CodeGenius is accused of replicating and using a similar software code to InnovateTech’s platform, which has led to the dispute.

Key Events:

  1. Discovery of Intellectual Property Theft: InnovateTech alleges that during a collaborative project between the two companies, CodeGenius gained unauthorized access to their proprietary software code. They claim that CodeGenius then used this code as the foundation for their own product, violating intellectual property rights.
  2. Cease and Desist Letter: InnovateTech, upon discovering the alleged theft, sent a cease and desist letter to CodeGenius, demanding they cease using the disputed code and compensate for damages incurred.
  3. Legal Action: With CodeGenius denying the allegations and refusing to comply with the cease and desist order, InnovateTech initiated legal proceedings, filing a lawsuit against CodeGenius for intellectual property theft, seeking damages, and an injunction to prevent further use of their code.
  4. CodeGenius’ Defense: CodeGenius maintains that they developed their software independently and refute the claims of intellectual property theft. They argue that any similarities between the two products are coincidental.

Legal Issues:

  • Ownership of Intellectual Property: The central issue revolves around whether InnovateTech can prove ownership of the intellectual property and establish that CodeGenius unlawfully used it.
  • Damages: InnovateTech is seeking compensation for financial losses resulting from the alleged theft, including lost revenue and damage to their reputation.
  • Injunction: InnovateTech is also seeking an injunction to prevent CodeGenius from using their intellectual property in the future.


The case is currently in the pre-trial phase, with both parties preparing their evidence and arguments. The court will need to assess the evidence presented by both sides to determine the validity of InnovateTech’s claims and whether CodeGenius is liable for intellectual property theft. This case underscores the importance of safeguarding intellectual property rights and the complexity of legal disputes in the tech industry.